Ink Test: Archival Properties

Stanislav Shalunov, April 2004

Graphite pencils and gel pens are the most archival, while color Sharpie markers are the worst. Mechanical pencils, ballpoint pens, and all children's pencils and crayons are in between.

An accelerated aging test of archival properties of several writing implements was performed as follows: the implements were used to write (or print) their own names on three separate sheets of alkaline Strathmore Pure Cotton paper; one of the sheets was placed in a plastic sleeve and was kept in a metal filing cabinet; one was taped from the inside to a second-floor window facing south (the window is made of two layers of ordinary float glass); the remaining sheet was tacked at four corners to a guard rail on the back porch, facing south. The first sheet was not intentionally exposed to any environmental factors and was kept for comparison purposes. The second sheet received ample light (including ultraviolet light that passes through float glass); thus, light-fastness was tested. The third sheet was exposed to unfiltered sunlight, acidic rain, snow, and repeated cycles of freezing and thawing in Ann Arbor. The test started on 2003-11-05 and was discontinued on 2004-04-02 when the sheet outside was torn by the wind; the experiment thus lasted through Michigan winter for 150 days.

The results are presented in the following table.

Writing ImplementExposed to LightExposed to Light, Rain, etc.
Ink Test Results
HP LaserJet 4100 laser printerNo changeNo change
Pigma Micron 0.5 black markerNo changeNo change
Higgins India InkNo changeNo change
Pentel esharp 0.5 pencilNo changeNo change
General's Kimberly 2H pencilNo changeNo change
Conte graphite 2B pencilNo changeNo change
Uniball Vision pen (blue)No changeNo change
Uniball gelgrip pen (black)No changeNo change
Uniball UM-100 pen (black)No changeNo change
Zebra rollerball pen (black)No changeNo change
Zebra rollerball pen (blue)No changeNo change
Zebra Jimnie Gel Roller Ball Medium pen (red)No changeLight fading
Panasonic FP-7824 photocopy machineNo changeSmall chunks of black missing
General's charcoal 4B pencilNo changeSmudged
Cheap felt tip pen (black)No changeAlmost imperceptible smudging
Bic Great Erase 0.7 pencil, JapanNo changeSmudged
Conte carbon HB pencilNo changeLight smudging
Conte sepiaNo changeLight smudging
Conte sanguineNo changeSmudged
Faber 2663 china markerNo changePossibly light smudging
Sharpie twin tip (either end, black)No changeLight smudging
Super Sharpie (black)No change (seeped through)Light smudging
Cheap ballpoint pen (black)Significantly fadedBarely legible
Pentel RSVP BK91 ballpoint pen (black)Significantly fadedAlmost no trace left
Cheap ballpoint pen (black)Significantly fadedBarely legible
Bic Atlantis ballpoint pen (blue)FadedBarely legible
Pilot PB-S fine ballpoint pen (blue)Barely legibleAlmost no trace left
General's watercolor pencil (blue)Light fadingLight fading, light smudging
General's watercolor pencil (black)Light fadingLight fading, light smudging
General's watercolor pencil (red)Light fadingSignificantly washed out
General's watercolor pencil (brown)Light fadingLight fading, light smudging
General's watercolor pencil (orange)Significant fadingVery significantly washed out and faded
Red wax crayonBarely legibleLittle trace left
Cheap ballpoint pen (black)Lightly fadedSignificantly faded
Papermate ballpoint pen (red)Light fadingNo visible trace left
Bic Atlantis ballpoint pen (red)Significantly fadedNo visible trace left
Super Sharpie (red)Significantly fadedNo visible trace left
Super Sharpie (blue)Significantly faded and fully discoloredNo visible trace left
Cheap ballpoint pen (rose)Barely legibleNo visible trace left
Sharpie extra fine (blue)Very significantly faded and discoloredNo visible trace left

Note: I have identified the writing implements as fully as I could; in the case of giveaways and hotel pens, where manufacturer is not specified and reproducibly obtaining the same kind of pen is not possible, I simply specified ``cheap'' instead of the name of the (unknown) manufacturer.

Salient points:


The test is unscientific (I could have exerted different pressure on the three different sheets of paper; controlled source of light would have been preferable) and the findings should be viewed as my personal opinion.

Comments